Democracy Alert

Truth & Transparency = A Stronger Democracy

January 23, 2017 by Ted Leave a Comment

Foreign Policy of John F Kennedy and George W Bush

In this essay I'm to explain about foreign policy of two American presidents; the similarities and differences .For some reasons I've chosen John F. Kennedy and George W. Bush, although every president has his own foreign policy, but I think in one spot the foreign policy of John F Kennedy and George W Bush becomes similar, this spot is war. Also both of them are idealist, their idealism in their speech, before the beginning of the wars is definite.

Therefore in this essay I try to clarify how American presidents claim something as good and peaceful for both the occupied country and the rest of the world, but ideologically think and practically act contrary to their claims. In fact how they do other than they say about their foreign policy; how these presidents claim that they are idealist but they began the wars and how similar they propagandize public opinions in order to their goal which is imperialism and accordingly capitalism.

George W Bush & Iraq War

Remember President Bush' speeches and declaration of Iraq war. According to his speeches, what was the main reason of war?

" ... for more than a decade the United States and other nations have pursued patient and honorable efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime without war [...] peaceful efforts to disarm Iraqi regime have failed again and again .[...]this regime has already used weapons of mass destruction against Iraq 's neighbors and against Iraq` s people.

[...] it (Iraq) has a deep hatred of America and our friends. And it (Iraq) has aided, trained and harbored terrorists, including operatives of Al Qaeda. The danger is clear ; using chemical ,biological or, one day, nuclear weapons ,the terrorists [...] could kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country ,or any other.[...] before the day of horror can come, before it is too late to act ,this danger will be removed.[...] if we must begin a military campaign , it will be against the lawless men who rule your country and not against you. We will deliver the food and medicine you need. [...] we will help you to build a new Iraq that is prosperous and free [...] the day of your liberation is near. [...] we are a peaceful people [...] if our enemies dare to strike us, they and all who have aided them ,will face fearful consequences [...] when the dictator has departed they can set an example to all the Middle East of a vital and peaceful and self-governing nation. [...] America and our allies accept that responsibility."(4)

If we want to examine the "rhetoric of Iraq conquest" (Callinicos, 2003:9) in speeches of Bush and his administration to compare his foreign policy in word and in practice, we can divide his claims to several categories as Callinicos divides:

1-"Fight against terrorism "

As Chomsky has pointed out ,"the problem is the selectivity with which the terrorism is applied''.(Barsamian ,2004:22 cited in Bellamy Foster&W.Mcchesney) Who are terrorists ? Those who are n` t with US and her allies .So the main narration is struggling between good and evil .This strategy of Bush and his administration is the thing that Eleanor Stein calls it the " construction of an enemy". (Stein ,2004:151 cited in Bellamy Foster & W. Mcchesney) He admonishes to remember Nazi propaganda technique :

"Pit race against race, religion against religion, prejudice against prejudice .Divide and conquer!"

2-"Destroying weapons of mass destruction"

What does it mean when some countries like Israel has weapons of mass destruction but it is n 't dangerous ?It 's clear ,Israel is the close alliance of the US.

3-"Democracy"

"This will not be a campaign of half measures, and we will accept no outcome except victory", Bush said(4) .But what is really victory? Is it democracy?

Bush and his administration justify their military operation to make Iraqi people free and to survive the world from danger. But does 'externally imposed democratic revolution' and 'killing half million people' justify 'external intervention to other regimes'?

4-"Liberalism"

That' s right ,Iraqis are free but after war .As Robert Cooper expressed: "Among ourselves we operate on the basis of laws [...] but when dealing with old-fashioned kinds of states outside the post-modern continent of Europe, we need to revert to the rougher methods of an earlier era [...] when we are operating in the jungle , we must also use the laws of the jungle". (Foster, 2004:161 cited in Bellamy Foster & W. Mcchesney)

After all ,As Noam Chomsky (Barsamian,2004:22 cited in Bellamy Foster & W. Machesney )said if Iraq was somewhere in central Africa it would n` t be chosen for this test case. But as Middle East and the Gulf region has a huge source of material wealth and oil, it 's chosen .All these show that reality is the other side of the coin. The foreign policy of George W Bush differs from word to practice.

John F Kennedy& Vietnam War

In late 1961, President John F. Kennedy requested more help for the South Vietnamese government in its war against the Vietcong guerrillas. (6)

Although there are multiple starting dates for the war, I choose president's message to congress, august 5, 1964, to show how president Kennedy in this war used words to show that he is idealist but in fact he wasn't: " [...]I further announced a decision to ask the Congress for a resolution expressing the unity and determination of the United States in supporting freedom and in protecting peace in southeast Asia.[...]these latest actions of the North Vietnamese regime have given a new and grave turn to the already serious situation in southeast Asia [...] Our policy in southeast Asia has been consistent and unchanged since 1954. I summarized it on June 2 in four simple propositions:

1. America keeps her word. Here as elsewhere, we must and shall honor our commitments.

2. The issue is the future of Southeast Asia as a whole. A threat to any nation in that region is a threat to all, and a threat to us.

3. Our purpose is peace.. We have no military, political, or territorial ambitions in the area.

4. This is not just a jungle war, but a struggle for freedom on every front of human activity. Our military and economic assistance to South Vietnam and Laos in particular has the purpose of helping these countries to repel aggression and strengthen. The United States will continue in its basic policy of assisting the free nations of the area to defend their freedom [...] we must make it clear to all that the United States is united in its determination to bring about the end of Communist subversion and aggression in the area . "(7)

At that time, Kennedy and his administration believed in a modernization model; all nations followed the same general road of economic and social development ,so this model is a way to protect south Vietnam while help it throughout the stages of economic growth.

But the reality was another thing, fearing the spread of communism President Kennedy believed that America could and should shape the destiny of the world's developing countries .Following this way ,President Lyndon Johnson sustained missions in North Vietnam , Nixon followed the way of previous presidents too.

According to "the propaganda tools" term (Amin ,2004:104. cited in Bellamy Foster & W. Mcchesney) ,the term that Gobbels gave, America manipulated the intelligence of people before entrancing to the war .This manipulation of intelligence was such a strong propaganda that the Vietnam war was explained as the result of "poor political intelligence". It was the consequence of this manipulation that most Americans believed that America were intervening to help a country that has been a victim of foreign aggression and also believed that if they lose Indochina and specially Vietnam they world will end up communism.

But this war was the consequence of American interest to extend US capitalism and control over the world.

This propaganda even continues after the war ,after all this times ,US Defence Secretary ,William Cohen said that "he didn `t intend to apologize for the attitude of the us forces during the Vietnam war."(5)

Conclusion

Does America really have right to intervene to internal problems of other countries?
According to the definition of right by Mill that "to have a right is to have a justifiable claim against others that some interests be protected or promoted." (Knowles,2002:165), it had .
But isn`t it right that ' this right 'is contrary to freedom?

As Rousseau tells us "our freedom derives from our free will ,or capacity to resist the desires which press us together with our status as independent creatures, neither subject to the demands of others nor dependent on them to get what we want." (Knowles,2002:105)

If we compare two presidents's foreign policy and strategy in these two wars ,with this definition ,we can conclude that these presidents can't bestow freedom to other countries. As Samir Amin expressed ,the US program is imperialist but it' s not exactly the same imperialist that Antonio Negri explained that, since it does n 't "aim to change the societies into a capitalist system but to loot their sources." (Amin,2004:105 cited in Bellamy Foster & W. Mcchesney )

These two presidents are idealist when they talk about their foreign policy .But there is a gap between their words and reality. Behind such words lay "dreams of absolute global domination, of imposing a planetary Pox Americana by force of arms".(8)

We should be aware how an idealist language can be used to shape foreign policy of American presidents to reach imperialism and capitalism; their real goal.

REFRENCES

1-Bellamy Foster,John &W.Mcchesney ,Robert:editors,2004,Pox Americana, London :Pluto press.

2-Calliniocos,Alex,2003,The New Mandarins of American Power,UK:polity press

3- Knowles,Dudley,2002,Political Philosophy,London:routledge

MA student of North American Studies-Tehran University

Filed Under: Foreign Policy Tagged With: Bush, Foreign, George, John, Kennedy, Policy

August 11, 2015 by Ted Leave a Comment

Latest Foreign Policy News

For Venezuela, Election Monitoring With a Wink and a Nod
As voters confront soaring inflation, an acute cash crunch, and a soaring crime rate, the last thing he and his United Socialist Party want are foreign election monitors constraining them prior to the crucial vote. “We will not accept them,” Maduro ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

How to Destroy a War Economy
“If African governments and international partners step up with strong support, we can transform how we work together to promote security and peace in Africa,” Obama said in a July 28 speech in Ethiopia. He also threatened ... A collaborative effort ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

The United States of Myanmar?
A federal system of government may be Myanmar's best step forward towards national unity and a more robust democratic process. By Brandon TensleyBrandon Tensley is a freelance journalist. He holds an M.Phil. in politics from Oxford University. Follow ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Germany Drags Its Feet on Third Bailout as Debt Payment …
By David FrancisDavid Francis is a staff writer for Foreign Policy, where he oversees FP's breaking news blog, The Cable. An award-winning journalist, David has reported from all over Europe, Nigeria, Kenya, Mexico, and Afghanistan on terrorism ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Filed Under: Foreign Policy Tagged With: Foreign, Latest, News, Policy

June 29, 2015 by Ted Leave a Comment

Latest Foreign Policy News

The Enemy You Know and the Ally You Don't
In September of last year, Nujaifi paid $ 300,000 of his own money to a Washington consulting firm to help rally support among influential foreign-policy elites and policymakers in the United States for his plan to arm a state militia for Nineveh. This ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Where to Invest Around the World, 2015 Edition
India's up, America's down, and Venezuela brings up the rear in the Baseline Profitability Index. By Daniel AltmanDaniel Altman is senior editor, economics at Foreign Policy and is an adjunct professor at New York University's Stern School of Business ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

After SCOTUS Ruling, China's Twitter Is Trending Rainbows Too
By Bethany Allen-EbrahimianBethany Allen-Ebrahimian is a Tea Leaf Nation fellow at Foreign Policy. She spent four years in China before joining Foreign Policy and holds a master's degree in East Asian studies from Yale University. June 26, 2015; bethany.
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Viral in China: A Bittersweet Farewell to Hong Kong
A former lawyer in New York and Hong Kong, David first encountered China as a Peace Corps volunteer. He has appeared on BBC television, Al Jazeera English, Public Radio International, Voice of America, and other outlets as a commentator on China.
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Filed Under: Foreign Policy Tagged With: Foreign, Latest, News, Policy

June 26, 2015 by Ted Leave a Comment

Latest Foreign Policy News

New Findings Pinpoint Africa's Elephant Poaching Hotspots
By Benjamin SolowayBenjamin Soloway is an editorial assistant at Foreign Policy. He worked previously in Indonesia as a web editor and Princeton in Asia journalism fellow at the Jakarta Globe. He has also lived in Turkey and Brazil. His work has been ...
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Still Cozy After All These Years
... Cold War Crucible: The Korean Conflict and the Postwar World., Sergey RadchenkoSergey Radchenko is a reader in international politics at Aberystwyth University and a former public policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Filed Under: Foreign Policy Tagged With: Foreign, Latest, News, Policy

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

Democracy Alert Newsletter

Thanks for Subscribing
Please remember to Confirm. Your Confirmation Email is on its way.

Most Popular Areas

2014 2015 About America Bill Capitalism Clinton Corruption Crony Democracy Donald Trump Foreign Freedom from Fund Government Hazard Hedge History Income Inequality Insider John Latest Manipulation Market Moral Moyers News Plutocracy Policy Public Publishes Putin Russia Shadowstats Statistics Street Trading Trump U.S. Unemployment vladimir Putin Wall Williams

Recent Posts

  • Simple, Inexpensive Solution to Open the Country, Increase Vaccination Rates, Overcome Vaccine Hesitancy and Get Back to Normal Faster
  • Trump’s Treason
  • Security Chief in White House Loses Leg to “Hoax” Virus Flouts Mask Requirement
  • Trump’s Supreme Court Gets It Wrong – Many Americans Will Die!
  • Covid Graph Showing Stark Difference Between Democratic & Republican State

Simple, Inexpensive Solution to Open the Country, Increase Vaccination Rates, Overcome Vaccine Hesitancy and Get Back to Normal Faster

April 27, 2021 By Ted Leave a Comment

We are all anxious to get over the Covid pandemic as soon as possible and get our lives back to normal as quickly as possible. I have a simple, inexpensive solution that will open the country faster, Increase vaccination rates, overcome vaccine hesitancy and eliminate confusion about the effectiveness of the vaccines and exactly how […]

Trump’s Treason

January 4, 2021 By Ted Leave a Comment

Trump  must be impeached immediately. His attempted coup has failed. We have heard him float suggestions will declare martial law. We must make sure that we short circuit Trump’s attempts to destroy democracy. Unlike Trump’s unfounded claims of voter fraud which were not supported by any evidence evidence of Trump’s muyoltiple crimes are in plain […]

Security Chief in White House Loses Leg to “Hoax” Virus Flouts Mask Requirement

December 18, 2020 By D Alert Leave a Comment

https://youtu.be/OawHa1w0-P4 Trump and Pence have been criscrossing the country holding mass rallies of largely maskless people. This disregard for other people continued as more than 600 holiday parties were scheduled by Pompao and other. Trump continued to say that covid would disappear. Or don’t be afraid of it. (Trump got cutting edge medical treatment that […]

Trump’s Supreme Court Gets It Wrong – Many Americans Will Die!

December 1, 2020 By D Alert Leave a Comment

The Conservative Trump Supreme court gets it wrong and many Americans will die. The conservative Trump court voted against New York’s 10 and 25 person capacity limits. None of the Justices has a background in epidemiology or pandemic responses yet they chose to overrule the health experts recommendations to the states. They also chose to override […]

Covid Graph Showing Stark Difference Between Democratic & Republican State

November 20, 2020 By Ted Leave a Comment

https://dangoodspeed.com/covid/total-cases-since-june This animated graphic shows the normalized covid cases in the states since June. Normaized means that it is showing the number of cases per 100,000 so we are comparing on an equal basis no matter what the population of the various states are. The June date was chosen because before then the US was […]

Republicans Are Coming For Your Health Care

October 12, 2020 By Ted Leave a Comment

Republicans are coming for the Health care coverage that is currently protecting the health of millions of Americans with the Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act provides millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions like diabetes, cancer and the long term effects of Covid19. It’s obvious from the rushed hearing to confirm Justice Amy Coney […]

Trump’s Top Choice For Supreme Court A Member of Group Former Members Call A Cult

September 24, 2020 By D Alert Leave a Comment

Trump’s Top Choice for the Supreme court Judge Amy Coney Barrett a member of a religious group People of Praise that former members call a cult. Judge Amy Coney Barrett has been quotedas saying that her main goal of her law career is “rebuilding the house of the lord.” Let’s put that together with her membership in […]

Spam Blocker

1 442 spam blocked by CleanTalk

Handcrafted with on the Genesis Framework